Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40272077›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025

Comparison of Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster Test Strategies in Patients with Glaucoma.

Seher Köksaldı, Gül Arıkan, Ömer Faruk Dadaş, Üzeyir Günenç

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seher KöksaldıAğrı İbrahim Çeçen University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ağrı, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-4088
Gül ArıkanDokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-8250
Ömer Faruk DadaşEge University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2692-3762
Üzeyir GünençPrivate Practice, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0504-0370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare 24-2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard (SS), SITA Fast (SF), and SITA Faster (SFR) tests performed with Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA3 Model 840, Zeiss) in patients with glaucomatous visual field (VF) defect. Materials and Methods: Total of 72 eyes of 72 patients with glaucomatous VF defects were included in the study. Test duration, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), visual field index (VFI), and the width and depth of glaucomatous VF defect were compared among the three tests. Results: The most common diagnoses were primary open-angle glaucoma in 45 eyes (62.5%) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in 10 eyes (13.9%). Mean test durations for the SS, SF, and SFR tests were 420.38±53.87 s, 275.94±45.52 s, and 191.89±35.48 s, respectively. Test durations were found to be statistically significantly different in all three tests (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the three tests in terms of MD, width, or depth of glaucomatous VF defect (p=0.211, p=0.762, and p=0.701, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference among the three tests in terms of VFI and PSD values (p=0.008 and p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Test duration was found to be shorter in the SFR test when compared to SS and SF tests. However, all three tests were similar in terms of the width and depth of the glaucomatous VF defect.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesGlaucomaSITA FastSITA FasterSITA Standardvisual field

Identifiers

PMID40272077
PMCPMC12035064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.