ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2026
Advance Care Planning Engagement of Older Adults in the Emergency Department.
Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ceiling of Care in Acute Care Settings: A Concept Analysis.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) helps older adults make end-of-life medical decisions. While ACP discussions are associated with improved patient outcomes, overall engagement remains low in the emergency department (ED).ObjectivesThis study assessed ACP engagement in older ED patients.MethodsWe conducted a questionnaire study among adults ≥65 in a Boston ED (July-Oct 2023). Our primary outcome was ACP Engagement as measured by a validated 9-item instrument with three ACP self- efficacy and six ACP readiness questions. Secondary outcomes included participants' preferences for learning about five ACP topics in the ED-medical decision makers, what matters most, leeway and flexibility for decision makers, sharing wishes, and asking questions)-as well as their favored learning formats (eg, pamphlets, videos, clinician conversations). Each was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. We examined the relationship between ACP engagement and existing electronic health record (EHR) documentation.ResultsNinety-nine older adults participated (mean age 75.5; 53.5% women). On the 9-item ACP Engagement Survey, participants reported high overall scores with a mean of 4.1 (95% CI: 4.0-4.2). Among ACP readiness topics, 80 (81.6%) named a decision-maker; 37 (40.2%) discussed end-of-life wishes with doctors. Participants preferred ED team conversations. Among the 51 participants who reported having signed paperwork regarding end-of-life wishes, only 7 (13.7%) had forms documented in the EHR.ConclusionsAmong older adults in a large Boston-based ED, ACP engagement was high, but few patients had documentation of end-of-life wishes available in the EHR. Findings highlight the need for better ACP documentation in EDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.