Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271956›Full record

ArticleTrauma, violence & abuse2026

Black and Minoritized Women's Experiences of Specialist Domestic Violence Services in the United Kingdom (UK): A Scoping Review.

Penelope E Lowe, Sally McManus, Pardis Asadi Zeidabadi, Ravi K Thiara, Sumanta Roy, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Ladan Hashemi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Penelope E LoweUniversity of Roehampton, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-1477-054X
Sally McManusCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-0819
Pardis Asadi ZeidabadiCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Ravi K ThiaraUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sumanta RoyImkaan, London, UK.
Estela Capelas BarbosaUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Ladan HashemiCity St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-3834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review maps the existing available literature on Black and minoritized women's experiences with specialist Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) services in the UK to summarize current understanding and identify knowledge gaps. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases and gray literature sources. All articles had to include Black and minoritized women's experiences of DVA services. In total, 29 UK-based studies published between 2000 and 2024 were identified. Data were synthesized to identify key themes and gaps. Thematic analysis of the findings revealed three main themes: additional service needs, barriers to accessing support, and the pivotal role of "by and for" services. Our review concludes that "by and for" services-provided by and for minoritized women-which adopt an intersectional approach are crucial in addressing the unique needs of Black and minoritized "survivor-victims", particularly in terms of language support, practical assistance, and community-related support. There is a need for more peer-reviewed literature to recognize the role of "by and for" services, using diverse methodologies to support Black and minoritized communities better.

Indexed as

Black PeopleDomestic ViolenceMinority GroupsBattered WomenFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansUnited KingdomBlack and minoritized women“by and for” servicesdomestic violence and abuseintersectionally competentservice provisionspecialist

Identifiers

PMID40271956
PMCPMC13287306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.