ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Fused Deposition Modeling Process in the Production of Low-Density ABS Lattice Structures.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of 2D PLA Structural Metamaterials-Methodology and Challenges for Properties Assessment.Polymers · 2026Article
- Influence of Surface Treatments on the Pull-Off Performance of Adhesively Bonded Polylactic Acid (PLA) Specimens Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) has emerged as one of the most widely adopted additive manufacturing (AM) technologies due to its broad material availability and low production costs, enabling the efficient production of complex geometries and customized components. Among the materials commonly used in AM, Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) is particularly notable for its favorable mechanical properties, ease of processing, and versatility. While moderate-to-high-density lattice configurations have been extensively studied, low relative density lattice structures remain largely unexplored. This study investigates the feasibility of fabricating Cuboidal Body-Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice structures with relative densities of 5%, 10%, and 15% using FDM. The geometrical/dimensional accuracy of the printed samples is thoroughly assessed to quantify fabrication-induced deviations, focusing on strut geometry and overall lattice consistency. Results show that while smaller lattice configurations, particularly those with 5% relative density, exhibit significant geometrical inaccuracies due to printing limitations (e.g., strut waviness, material deposition inconsistencies, layer misalignment), larger configurations demonstrate improved dimensional and geometrical fidelity and structural integrity. A framework is proposed for assessing geometrical/dimensional fidelity, which can enhance the predictive modeling of these structures and optimize manufacturing processes. These findings clarify low relative density lattice manufacturability, guiding research on mechanical performance for lightweight aerospace applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.