Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271905›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Finite Element Analysis of Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) and Bone Stresses for Implant Inclinations of 0°, 15°, and 20°.

Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Giulia Marchioli, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Luciano Lamberti, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mario CeddiaDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-2002-9938
Tea RomascoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-3838
Giulia MarchioliDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-2652-7292
Luca ComuzziIndependent Researcher, 31020 San Vendemiano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8337-5857
Alessandro CipollinaIndependent Researcher, 92019 Sciacca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-0647
Adriano PiattelliSchool of Dentistry, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.
Luciano LambertiDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.
Natalia Di PietroDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9720-2116
Bartolomeo TrentadueDepartment of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Polytechnic University of Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5759-0692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to utilize finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the primary stability of Cyroth dental implants (AoN Implants Srl, Grisignano di Zocco, Italy) under various biomechanical conditions, including different implant inclinations (0°, 15°, and 20°) and bone densities (D3 and D4). By comparing these results with those obtained from in vitro tests on polyurethane blocks, the study sought to determine whether FEA could provide stability information more quickly and efficiently than in vitro methods. The research involved correlating dental implant micro-mobility with the implant stability quotient (ISQ) using FEA to simulate the mechanical behavior of implants and the surrounding bone tissue. Additionally, the study assessed the error in ISQ value detection by comparing FEA results with in vitro tests on polyurethane blocks conducted under the same experimental conditions. Both the FEA simulations and in vitro experiments demonstrated similar trends in ISQ values. For the D3 bone block simulated by FEA, the difference from the in vitro test was only 1.27%, while for the D2 bone, the difference was 2.86%. The findings also indicated that ISQ increases with implant inclination and that bone quality significantly affects primary stability, with ISQ decreasing as bone density diminishes. Overall, this study showed that ISQ evaluation for dental implants can be effectively performed through FEA, particularly by examining micro-movements. The results indicated that FEA and in vitro polyurethane testing yielded comparable outcomes, with FEA providing a faster and more cost-effective means of assessing ISQ across various clinical scenarios compared to in vitro testing.

Indexed as

dental implantsfinite element analysis (FEA)implant stability quotient (ISQ)inclinationpolyurethanestress distribution

Identifiers

PMID40271905
PMCPMC11990274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.