ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantitative Characterization of Bubble Defects in Ultra-Low Expansion Quartz Glass via Ultrasonic Interaction.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The existence of bubble defects in ultra-low expansion quartz glass will affect the optical properties and mechanical strength of the material. The present paper proposes a novel defect characterization method based on ultrasonic nondestructive testing. The simulation model of bubble defect detection in ultra-low expansion quartz glass was established using numerical simulation technology, and experimental verification was carried out. The propagation mechanism of the ultrasound and its interaction with bubble defects were then analyzed. The results showed that the shape of the reflected wave was similar to that of the corresponding defect, and the scattering of the reflected wave was different due to the different curvature radius of the defect interface. The acoustic scattering characteristics of the circular defect were more obvious than those of the elliptical defect. Finally, an analysis of the interaction between different depth defects and different size defects and the ultrasound was conducted, leading to the conclusion that the relative amplitude of the defect echo corresponding to a 6 mm probe diameter shows a monotonic decreasing relationship with the defect depth, and there is also a monotonic corresponding relationship between the relative amplitude of the defect echo and the size of bubble defect. Therefore, it can be concluded that the relative amplitude of the defect echo can be used to characterize the size of the bubble defect. This study not only analyses the interaction between defects and ultrasound but also provides a quantitative characterization of defects using the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.