ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Distinguishing the Contribution of Extracellular Electron Transfer in the
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) in anaerobic environments accounts for many severe failures and losses in different industries. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) represent a typical class of corrosive microorganisms capable of acquiring electrons from steel through extracellular electron transfer processes, thereby inducing severe electrical microbially influenced corrosion (EMIC). Although prior research has underscored the significance of extracellular electron transfer, the contribution of EMIC to the whole MIC has not been comprehensively studied. In this study, Q235 steel coupons were employed in an H-shaped electrochemical cell to conduct electrochemical and coupon immersion experiments, aiming to determine the contribution of EMIC to the overall MIC. The experiments were conducted under two distinct carbon source conditions: 100% carbon source (CS) and 1% CS environments. It was observed that the biotic electrodes exhibited significantly higher cathodic currents, with the most pronounced biological cathodic activity detected in the 100% CS biotic medium. The voltammetric responses of the electrodes before and after changes in the medium confirmed the biocatalytic capability of the attached biofilm in stimulating the cathodic reaction. The proportion of EMIC in MIC was calculated using linear polarization resistance, revealing a trend over time. Additionally, weight loss tests indicated that the contribution of EMIC to the total MIC was approximately 27.69%. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that while the overall corrosion rate was lower in the 1% CS environment, the proportion of EMIC in MIC increased to approximately 37.68%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.