ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multicriteria Decision Analysis of the Influence of Natural Fibers on the Flexibility of Renewable Polyurethane Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renewable polyurethane (PU) composites were developed using castor oil and long coir (LCF), ground coir (GCF) or cellulose fiber (CF) at PU/fiber ratios of 50/50, 60/40 and 70/30 wt/wt%, respectively. The aim was to study the influence of natural fibers on composite flexibility via thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy and water absorption, density, tensile strength, flexural and flammability tests. The set of properties was evaluated (1) subjectively by assigning importance values to the different properties and (2) via multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). In general, the PU composites with cellulose fiber (PU/CF) exhibited higher thermal degradation temperatures, greater tensile moduli and toughness and less flammability. The composites with the best results for both analysis methods (property set analysis) were PU/CF:60/40 wt/wt% and 70/30 wt/wt%, obtained with cellulose fiber (low lignin content) and the highest PU percentage; these were the most suitable for applications that require flexibility, such as in interior design. When comparing the different coir fiber sizes, the composites containing more long coir fiber (PU/LCF 60/40 wt/wt% and 70/30 wt/wt%) presented the best results. The results of subjective property set analysis were validated using multicriteria analysis, resulting in a simple analysis for application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.