Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271848›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Erosive Wear Mechanisms of Materials-A Review of Understanding and Progresses.

Tong Deng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tong DengThe Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Central Avenue, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4117-4317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erosive wear of materials caused by solid particles leads to severe damage on the surface of structure materials and results in mechanical failures. Erosion has been extensively studied for many years in terms of mechanisms, material properties, and impact dynamics. Since the early 21st century, little progress has been made on the evaluation of surface erosive failure due to multiple impacts of particulate solids. The major difficulty is the enormous number of variables involved in the erosion process. However, the existing theories are only able to take a few of them and end up with many assumptions on the others. In summary, the influential factors on erosion can be classified as impact dynamics (such as velocity and angles), mechanisms of material failures (deformation, cutting, and cracking), and material properties of solids and the surface (hardness, toughness, ductility, and brittleness). In this paper, erosion mechanisms and progress from the existing theories have been reviewed critically, which gives a better understanding of the phenomenon. Based on the review of the influential factors in terms of contributions to the process, proper evaluation methods of the erosion process have been discussed, which leads to further thinking of better assessments.

Indexed as

aggressiveness of solid particleserosion resistanceerosive wear mechanismsimpact dynamicsmaterial properties

Identifiers

PMID40271848
PMCPMC11990582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.