ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Experimental Comparison of Abrasion Resistance of Extruded and 3D Printed Plastics.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Effects of gyroid lattice relative density on wear and mechanical performance of 3D printed TPU and flexible nylon for footwear.iScience · 2026Article
- Influence of Surface Texture in Additively Manufactured Biocompatible Materials and Triboelectric Behavior.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printing is becoming widely used and printed parts very often replace extruded parts. Plastics, due to their ability to work with steel without lubrication, are commonly used for sliding components and are therefore exposed to various types of wear, including abrasive wear. In this paper, abrasive wear resistance tests were carried out to compare extruded and 3D-printed samples. Moreover, microhardness tests, surface topography and microscopic observations of the surface of the samples before and after friction were also conducted. Samples were made from eight materials that are most commonly used in 3D FDM printing: PLA, PET-G, ABS, PA, PP, PC, PMMA and HIPS. For six out of the eight materials tested, samples made by extrusion proved to be more resistant to abrasive wear (between 10% and 24%) than those printed ones. Fabrication by 3D printing can lead to different object properties and thus different abrasion resistance. The abrasion resistance of extruded samples depends on factors reported in the literature such as hardness, density and surface roughness. In the case of 3D printed samples, no such relationship was found. For this reason, the researchers believe that the reduced abrasion wear resistance of printed samples is due to their specific internal structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.