ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
On the Mechanical Performance of an L-PBF 316l Part Using the Performance-Line Instrumented Indentation Test (PL-IIT).
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation Between Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of an L-PBF 316L Alloy with an ISE-Free Parameter.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microstructure and Mechanical Performance Correlation in a Pulsed Laser Welded IN792 DS Alloy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improvement of the Surface Layer Properties of 316L Stainless Steel Produced by DMLS Through the Use of a Shot Peening Process.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While L-PBF research continuously expands technologically towards more complex-shaped components and effective scanning strategies, the customization of the mechanical performance of these components to specific applications is still challenging. The presence of high process-induced residual stress levels frequently makes the current (standard) mechanical testing procedures ineffective or even inappropriate. The current engineering design principles cannot be applied to L-PBF components as the available mechanical properties are apparent (i.e., space and residual stress dependent properties). It is the aim of this work to overcome the aforementioned limitations by presenting a comprehensive methodology that can be used to determine the mechanical performance of an L-PBF 316L deposit along (five) pre-specified directions, denoted as performance lines (PLs), and in six special key regions, denoted as performance zones (PZs), through the nanoindentation test (PL-nIIT). The PLs determine the gradients of the indentation properties across the deposit, while the PZs exhibit the orientation-dependent mechanical performance in a specified number of regions of the deposit. The latter can be used for benchmarking, mechanical design, or performance customization. The frequently resorted to indentation modulus and hardness have thus been complemented with a new indentation size effect-free property (i.e., the loading stiffness rate, LSR) to help discriminate the presence of residual stress at different depths in the given deposit. A decreasing mild compressive residual stress was determined along the build direction of the deposit as revealed by the decreasing values of the relative LSR, H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.