Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271636›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Multiscale Investigation of Modified Recycled Aggregate Concrete on Sulfate Attack Resistance.

Xue-Fei Chen, Xiu-Cheng Zhang, Guo-Hui Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xue-Fei ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-4088
Xiu-Cheng ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.
Guo-Hui YanJinxi Holding Group Co., Ltd., Putian 351100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the sulfate resistance of modified recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) by applying carbonation and nano-silica soaking methodologies. Recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) derived from concretes of C30 and C60 strength grades were subjected to these modification techniques and subsequently utilized in the fabrication of RAC specimens. The results show notable porosity and crack density within the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) interfacing recycled aggregate and cement paste in recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Specifically, the porosity within the ITZ of RAC is observed to be up to 30% higher than that of virgin aggregate concrete. These pathways facilitate the penetration of sulfate ions, subsequently inducing deterioration and resulting in a compression strength reduction of up to 40%. While carbonation treatment exhibits a moderate enhancement in sulfate resistance, decreasing the sulfate penetration depth by 15%, the incorporation of 2% nano-silica by weight of cement proves significantly more effective. This addition reduces the sulfate penetration depth by over 30% and lowers the sulfate concentration by 25%. Furthermore, the compressive strength of RAC modified with nano-silica increases by 15% following 28 days of sulfate exposure. Additionally, a 30% reduction in the sulfate ion mass equilibrium depth is observed in nano-silica-modified RAC, accompanied by a markedly lower sulfate concentration in the pore solution. After 56 days of sulfate attack, the compressive strength of nano-silica-modified RAC retains 85% of its initial value, whereas unmodified RAC decreases to 70%. Notably, the quality of recycled aggregate significantly impacts sulfate resistance, with high-strength RCA (exceeding 40 MPa) demonstrating superior resistance compared to low-strength RCA (below 20 MPa). Consequently, RAC produced with high-strength RCA experiences only a 20% loss in compressive strength under sulfate attack, whereas RAC containing low-strength RCA suffers a 40% loss. The novelty of this study is the effective use of nano-silica soaking and carbonation to enhance the sulfate resistance and compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete originated from both normal and high-strength reference concrete.

Indexed as

concreteconstruction wasterecycled aggregates

Identifiers

PMID40271636
PMCPMC11989788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.