Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271585›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of the Effects of Rubber Dosage and Digestion Time on the Mechanical Properties of Low Dosage Crumb-Rubber-Modified Asphalt Concrete Mixtures.

Greg White, Andrew Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Greg WhiteSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0388-1064
Andrew KiddBrisbane City Council, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crumb rubber modification of bituminous binders for asphalt concrete mixture production has been shown to provide significant environmental benefits, in terms of reduced embodied carbon, as well as improvement in the mechanical performance properties of asphalt mixtures. Furthermore, even at low dosages of crumb rubber, significant anti-ageing benefits have been reported, in terms of oxidation and ultra-violet light exposure. However, the effect of low dosage crumb rubber modification on the mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures must be understood. This research compared otherwise nominally identical dense-graded asphalt mixtures produced with crumb rubber modified binder at 5%, 10%, and 15% (by weight of the bitumen) and, using short digestion (reflecting field blending) and long digestion (reflecting terminal blending), to two control asphalt mixtures across a range of mechanical properties indicative of stiffness, rutting resistance, fatigue cracking resistance, cold fracture resistance, and moisture damage resistance. It was concluded that 10% was the optimum crumb rubber content and that crumb rubber modification generally improved the mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures, particularly the deformation resistance and the fatigue cracking resistance, which were both improved significantly. However, the effect of crumb rubber content and digestion times was variable. Consequently, the decision to field blend (short duration) or terminal blend (long duration) should be based on logistics, and not on asphalt mechanical properties and the associated mixture performance.

Indexed as

asphaltbindercrumb rubbermechanical propertiesmodification

Identifiers

PMID40271585
PMCPMC11989474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.