ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2025
Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-World Experience From a US Community Oncology Network.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary Clinic Approach Improves Immunotherapy Treatment Outcomes in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Institutional Experience.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
- Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-institutional cohort study.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is a preferred first-line (1L) systemic therapy option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, evidence of its effectiveness in real-world clinical practice, including in patients with impaired liver function, remains limited. Patients and Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult patients who initiated 1L atezo-bev for uHCC within The US Oncology Network between 1/1/2019 and 8/31/2022 using structured and unstructured electronic health records data. Overall survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods for the overall cohort and in a subgroup of "trial-like" patients with characteristics that were consistent with those of the IMbrave150 Trial (ECOG performance status 0-1, Child-Pugh class A, albumin-bilirubin grade 1-2). Results: Overall, 374 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age 68.8 years, 78.9% male, 31% Child-Pugh class B-C among reported, 18% ECOG performance status ≥2 among reported), of whom 132 patients comprised the trial-like subgroup. At a median follow-up of 5.6 months, median (95% CI) OS was 13.2 (9.5, 15.9) months and rwPFS was 6.4 (5.1, 7.7) months. In the trial-like subgroup, median (95% CI) OS was 16.5 (13.2, NR) months and rwPFS was 9.4 (5.7, 12.5) months. Conclusion: Atezo-bev was used as 1L systemic therapy for HCC in a diverse patient population across US community oncology settings. Real-world effectiveness of atezo-bev among trial-like patients is comparable to that reported in the Phase 3 study. These data can help guide selection of appropriate treatment candidates and maximize the benefits of atezo-bev in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.