Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271473›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2025

Patient-Specific Solutions for Cranial, Midface, and Mandible Reconstruction Following Ablative Surgery: Expert Opinion and a Consensus on the Guidelines and Workflow.

Majeed Rana, Daniel Buchbinder, Gregorio Sánchez Aniceto, Gerson Mast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Majeed RanaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.
Daniel BuchbinderDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Gregorio Sánchez AnicetoDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain; gsaniceto@meytel.net.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9667-336X
Gerson MastDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany; gmast@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects following ablative surgeries requires a comprehensive approach that balances functional restoration with aesthetic outcomes. Advances in computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology have revolutionized this field, enabling precise preoperative planning, including 3D modeling, segmentation, and virtual resection planning. These methods allow for the production of patient-specific implants and surgical templates while facilitating the evaluation of treatment outcomes. CAD/CAM technology offers numerous benefits, such as enhanced surgical accuracy, improved aesthetic results, reduced operative times, and the possibility of single-stage resection and reconstruction. However, limitations exist, including high costs, the need for specialized expertise, and dependency on accurate imaging data. This paper provides a surgeon-centric evaluation of the advantages and limitations of CAD/CAM in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction. The discussion encompasses the technological workflow, clinical applications, and recommendations for optimizing outcomes. Future perspectives highlight ongoing developments, such as integrating non-ionizing imaging techniques and expanding the applicability of virtual and augmented reality. By synthesizing technical advancements and clinical expertise, this review aims to establish practical guidelines for implementing CAD/CAM technology in routine surgical practice.

Indexed as

3D modelingCAD/CAM technologycranio-maxillofacial reconstructiondigital workflowpatient-specific implantssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40271473
PMCPMC11995815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.