ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2025
General and Treatment-Specific Outcomes with Osseointegrated Implants in Auricular, Nasal, and Orbital Prosthetic Reconstruction.
Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw tumor resection: a mini-review of protocols and quality of life across treatment modalities.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Clinical and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes from Southern Osseointegrated Fixtures for Craniofacial Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2026Article
- The Longitudinal Impact of Radiotherapy on Osseointegrated Hearing Aid Outcomes and Complications.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsseointegrated implants outside of dental restoration remain an integral area of facial reconstruction in which more outcomes data is needed. We aimed to describe our 13-year experience using osseointegrated implants for orbital, nasal, and auricular reconstruction, looking at general outcomes, including radiated and surgically manipulated bone.
methodsThis retrospective chart review covered demographics and outcomes from January 2008 to August 2021 in patients who underwent an orbital exenteration, partial or total rhinectomy, and partial or total auriculectomy with subsequent osseointegrated implant placement. We hypothesized radiation would increase the failure rate of implants and prostheses.
resultsThere were 79 implants placed in 27 patients, with over half of the patients requiring implants for reconstruction because of malignancy. The success rate was 86%. Complications were uncommon. Only 2 (7.4%) patients were unable to use their prosthesis. Prior radiation and surgery to the bone were associated with an increased risk of loss of implant (
conclusionsOsseointegrated implants are a reliable, permanent option for a realistic prosthesis. Radiation and prior surgery are significantly associated with an increased risk of implant failure but not associated with the inability to use the prosthesis. Regardless of prior treatments, bone-retained implants should be considered in facial reconstruction, especially after failing autologous repair or with concerns for cosmetic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.