Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271449›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

Knife-assisted full-thickness resection guided by the pocket-detection method for posterior deeply invasive rectal cancer: A novel endoscopic approach (with video).

Maria Eva Argenziano, Andrea Sorge, Anne Hoorens, Michele Montori, Pieter Jan Poortmans, Sander Smeets, Tamas Tornai, Lynn K Debels, Lobke Desomer, David J Tate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria Eva ArgenzianoDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
Andrea SorgeDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-9949
Anne HoorensDepartment of Pathology University Hospital of Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
Michele MontoriDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
Pieter Jan PoortmansDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-5040
Sander SmeetsDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
Tamas TornaiDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
Lynn K DebelsDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
Lobke DesomerDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.
David J TateDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology University Hospital Ghent (UZ Ghent) Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0226-0434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local full-thickness resection techniques for rectal cancer are limited by lesion size, location, or poor margin delineation. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic knife-assisted full-thickness resection (kFTR) guided by the pocket-detection method (PDM) for deeply invasive rectal cancer. Consecutive posterior-lateral rectal lesions suspected of deep submucosal invasion treated at a tertiary care center from February to October 2024 were retrospectively included. kFTR guided by PDM involved creating a submucosal pocket to detect and isolate the suspected invasive component (muscle-retracting sign), followed by muscularis propria incision and full-thickness resection. Technical success, accuracy of detecting deep submucosal invasion, and en-bloc resection rates were 100%. The median procedure time was 141.5 [IQR 123.7-179.5] minutes and the median hospitalization was 1 [IQR 1-7] day. No adverse events occurred. Histopathology showed R1-vertical margin in patient 1 (pT2 adenocarcinoma) and R0 resection in patients 2, 3, and 4 (pT1bsm3) after refinement of the procedure to include a ≥3 mm muscularis propria margin around the suspected invasive component. There was no recurrence at the first endoscopic follow-up of patients 1, 2, and 4. Patient 3 was sent to surgical low anterior resection due to multiple high-risk histological features. The previous kFTR did not impair surgery (no residual rectal carcinoma and 1/17 positive lymph nodes). Endoscopic kFTR guided by the PDM may be a feasible organ-preserving treatment for the detection and resection of deeply invasive posterior rectal cancer. Future studies are needed to ascertain whether rectal kFTR could represent a viable alternative to conventional surgical local excision techniques.

Indexed as

endoscopic knife‐assisted full‐thicknessmuscle‐retracting signpocket‐detection methodrectal endoscopic kFTRrectal knife‐assisted full‐thickness resection

Identifiers

PMID40271449
PMCPMC12014851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.