ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2025
Psychometric analysis of the emotional availability scales for video-recorded interactions between parents and their preschool-aged children.
Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of parent-child interaction, the Emotional Availability Scales have been developed to capture a dyad's emotional connection in an observational setting by four parental and two child-related scales. This study aims to test the psychometric foundation of the EAS, including basic descriptive preconditions on the item level and structural validity on the scale level, for a preschool-aged sample; as such, it complements analyses by Aran for a sample of infants. The sample of parents and their preschool-aged children is a mixed clinically referred and non-clinical sample from a midsize city in Germany. Interactions were observed in a free-play setting and rated with the EAS by two blind and certificated raters. Several model tests indicate violations for the structural model as well as all six measurement models. An additional
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.