ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
Evaluation of a silicone-based flexible dry electrode for measuring human bioelectrical signals.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of conductive polymer-based dry electrodes with high conductivity is promising for practical applications in daily life due to their biocompatibility, flexibility, lightweight, and comfort. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of using a novel silicone-based dry electrode for measuring various bioelectrical signals.The silicone-based electrode, manufactured using an optimized polymer matrix, combines high conductivity with flexibility, ensuring superior wearability and reliable bioelectrical signal monitoring. To evaluate its performance, we compared its impedance and flexibility with those of a commercial electrode. Additionally, its compatibility for measuring biological signals was assessed through performance comparisons across various bioelectrical signals. Fourteen healthy participants performed three experimental paradigms: (1) eyes closed and open to measure alpha electroencephalography (EEG) as well as resting-state electrocardiography (ECG), (2) eye blinking to measure electrooculography (EOG), and (3) wrist movement to measure electromyography (EMG). All bioelectrical signals were measured simultaneously using both the silicone-based dry electrode and a commercial dry electrode. The performance of the silicone-based dry electrode was evaluated by comparing the signal quality of both electrodes. The silicone-based dry electrode exhibited lower electrical impedance (39.43 kΩ on average,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.