ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
Machine learning classifier solving the problem of sleep stage imbalance between overnight sleep.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feature extraction follows the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) sleep score manually and applies it to machine learning with a focus on the generalization of sleep data to enable data-centric artificial intelligence. In real-world clinical testing, the manual scoring of sleep stages is time-consuming and requires significant expertise. Additionally, it is subject to interobserver subjective bias. Machine-learning techniques offer a way to overcome these limitations through automation. However, machine learning for sleep phase prediction can perform poorly for small classes. If the distribution of the training data was unbalanced, the model was trained with a bias toward the majority class. To address this, we experimented with loss function adjustment and resampling methods that assign more weight to the prediction errors of minority classes in sleep scoring to determine how to overcome the data imbalance problem. Machine learning can also be used to compare the accuracy of each channel in identifying electrodes, which should be monitored more closely in real-world clinical testing. Owing to the small amount of data available for machine learning in this study, we used various machine learning classifiers by increasing or decreasing the dataset using sampling techniques and weighting different classes of sleep stages. In our experiments, the best-performing model for classifying sleep stages had an accuracy of 91.9%, kappa of 0.899, and F1-score of 86.9%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.