Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271381›Full record

ArticleBioMedInformatics2025

Strategies to Improve the Robustness and Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification in Neuroimaging.

Anh T Tran, Tal Zeevi, Seyedmehdi Payabvash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMedInformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anh T TranDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Tal ZeeviDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Seyedmehdi PayabvashDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4628-0370

Funding

Radiomics Signatures and Patient Outcomes in Intracerebral HemorrhageK23NS118056 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Seyedmehdi Payabvash · 2021 to 2026
$780k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2020097NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS118056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep learning models have revolutionized diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment planning by extracting complex patterns from medical images, enabling more accurate, personalized, and timely clinical decisions. Despite its promise, challenges such as image heterogeneity across different centers, variability in acquisition protocols and scanners, and sensitivity to artifacts hinder the reliability and clinical integration of deep learning models. Addressing these issues is critical for ensuring accurate and practical AI-powered neuroimaging applications. We reviewed and summarized the strategies for improving the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models for the segmentation and classification of neuroimages. This review follows a structured protocol, comprehensively searching Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus for studies on neuroimaging, task-specific applications, and model attributes. Peer-reviewed, English-language studies on brain imaging were included. The extracted data were analyzed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these techniques. The study identifies key strategies to enhance deep learning in neuroimaging, including regularization, data augmentation, transfer learning, and uncertainty estimation. These approaches address major challenges such as data variability and domain shifts, improving model robustness and ensuring consistent performance across diverse clinical settings. The technical strategies summarized in this review can enhance the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models for segmentation and classification to improve their reliability for real-world clinical practice.

Indexed as

classificationdeep learninggeneralizationneuroimagingrobustnesssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40271381
PMCPMC12014193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.