ArticleBioMedInformatics2025
Strategies to Improve the Robustness and Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification in Neuroimaging.
Article in BioMedInformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Convolutional neural network models of structural MRI for discriminating categories of cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying treatment-responsive patient subgroups in a neutral clinical trial of Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: A post hoc explainable machine learning analysis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven cancer diagnostics with improved robustness and interpretability.Chemical science · 2026Review
- YOLO-LS: a novel deep learning framework for brain tumor segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- fMRI-Based Prediction of Eye Gaze During Naturalistic Movie Viewing Reveals Eye-Movement-Related Brain Activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- fMRI-based prediction of eye gaze during naturalistic movie viewing reveals eye-movement-related brain activity.Psychoradiology · 2026Review
- Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures.Biology · 2025Article
- Multimodal Self-Supervised Learning for Early Alzheimer's: Cross-Modal MRI-PET, Longitudinal Signals, and Site Invariance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Optimization of the Non-Local Means Algorithm for Breast Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a 3D-Printed Breast-Mimicking Phantom.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Sequencing: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Article
- A quarter-century of synthetic data in healthcare: Unveiling trends with structural topic modeling.Digital healthReview
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: Current status and possibilities (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and deep learning models have revolutionized diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment planning by extracting complex patterns from medical images, enabling more accurate, personalized, and timely clinical decisions. Despite its promise, challenges such as image heterogeneity across different centers, variability in acquisition protocols and scanners, and sensitivity to artifacts hinder the reliability and clinical integration of deep learning models. Addressing these issues is critical for ensuring accurate and practical AI-powered neuroimaging applications. We reviewed and summarized the strategies for improving the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models for the segmentation and classification of neuroimages. This review follows a structured protocol, comprehensively searching Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus for studies on neuroimaging, task-specific applications, and model attributes. Peer-reviewed, English-language studies on brain imaging were included. The extracted data were analyzed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these techniques. The study identifies key strategies to enhance deep learning in neuroimaging, including regularization, data augmentation, transfer learning, and uncertainty estimation. These approaches address major challenges such as data variability and domain shifts, improving model robustness and ensuring consistent performance across diverse clinical settings. The technical strategies summarized in this review can enhance the robustness and generalizability of deep learning models for segmentation and classification to improve their reliability for real-world clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.