Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Biophilia in Italian preschool children: preliminary findings.

Sabine Pirchio, Sara Costa, Rosa Ferri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sabine PirchioDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sara CostaDepartment of Education, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.
Rosa FerriDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between biophilia, pro-environmental behaviors, and connectedness to nature in Italian preschool children. A total of 196 children (ages 24-65 months) and their parents participated. Children's biophilia and pro-environmental behaviors were assessed through a role-playing interview, while children connectedness to nature, experiences in the nature, and parents' pro-environmental behaviors were measured through indirect measures (questionnaires). The interview scores revealed significant positive correlations with children's connectedness to nature as well as nature exposure reported by parents even if not in every age group. Children's nature connectedness also correlated with pro-environmental behaviors and marginally, with parents' pro-environmental behaviors. The results showed that, as expected given the innate component of biophilia, biophilia scores were not significantly different across age groups, while older children engage in more pro-environmental behaviors than younger children, suggesting the significant role of education and socialization. These findings highlight the complexity of assessing preschool children's biophilia and connectedness to nature, particularly when combining direct measures (child interviews) with indirect measures (parental reports) and underscores the need for further research to refine the conceptualization of these constructs and explore their developmental trajectories.

Indexed as

biophiliainterviewnature connectednesspreschool childrenpro-environmental behaviors

Identifiers

PMID40271362
PMCPMC12014690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.