Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271267›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025

Machine learning in predicting infertility treatment success: A systematic literature review of techniques.

Shirin Dehghan, Hamid Moghaddasi, Reza Rabiei, Hamid Choobineh, Keivan Maghooli, Mojtaba Vahidi-Asl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shirin DehghanDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid MoghaddasiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza RabieiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid ChoobinehDepartment of Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keivan MaghooliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Science and Research Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba Vahidi-AslFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) is one of the major developments that has had a significant impact on infertility treatment. A predictive model of ART success based on machine learning (ML) techniques can provide a robust basis for estimating treatment success. This study aimed to identify predictive models of ART success and their determinants. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. Data extraction involved collecting data in studies on dataset characteristics, ML techniques, and predictive model performance indicators. The search resulted in 3655 records, of which 27 papers were selected for analysis. ML publications in ART prediction have been in the past 5 years. In general, 107 various features were reported in all reviewed studies. Female age was the most common feature used in all identified studies. Most studies (96.3%) applied a supervised approach to develop predictive models. Among all, support vector machine (SVM) was the most frequently applied technique (44.44%). Nineteen different indicators have been used in studies to evaluate the model performance. 74.07% of the reviewed papers reported area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) as their performance indicator. Accuracy (55.55%), sensitivity (40.74%), and specificity (25.92%) were also commonly reported. ML has the potential to bring hope to infertile couples and to facilitate making challenging decisions. Considering relevant contributing factors and ML techniques is critical for reliable predictive modeling.

Indexed as

Fertility/therapyFertilization invitrointracytoplasmicinvitroMachine learningReproductive techniquesSperm injection

Identifiers

PMID40271267
PMCPMC12017416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.