ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
The effectiveness of an unified transdiagnostic intervention based on common mechanisms on the obsessive-compulsive personality pattern.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of the protection motivation theory (PMT) in promoting preventive behaviors among nurses were exposed to radiation at hospitals: A-randomized controlled trail.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObsessive-compulsive personality disorder is a chronic condition characterized by a maladaptive pattern of excessive perfectionism, preoccupation with rules and details, and the urge to control the environment, which results in significant distress or impairment, especially in interpersonal functioning. Individuals diagnosed with the mentioned disorder are often seen as rigid, inflexible, and highly controlling. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of unified transdiagnostic interventions based on common mechanisms of obsessive personality patterns. MATERIALS AND
methodThis quantitative research is a semi-experimental single-case and multiple-base design with asynchronous participants. Five participants were selected using purposive sampling through semi-structured interviews based on DSM-5 among patients who visited the clinics during 2022-2023. The research included the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. Moreover, the treatment intervention was administered individually throughout 12 sessions with one session a week. Data analysis involved visual inspection or graphical representation of each case's improvement percentage and change index.
resultThe results from visual representation indicated that the transdiagnostic intervention based on common mechanisms significantly influenced the obsessive personality patterns at baseline, during treatment, and at follow-up. There was a significant change in the reliable change index compared to the baseline for all five participants. During the treatment phase, participants showed a mean score of 30.28 for the obsessive personality pattern, indicating a significant level of effectiveness. However, the mean score increased to 57.50 at the follow-up stage.
conclusionAccording to Blanchard and Schwartz's classification, the unified transdiagnostic interventions based on common mechanisms and their effectiveness on obsessive personality patterns fell into the improvement category during treatment and into the success category at the follow-up stage of the study. Overall, the findings suggest a bright future for the treatment of individuals with obsessive personality patterns, as unified diagnostic interventions show great potential for significant impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.