ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Clinical implementation of MRI for evaluation of titanium press-fit osseointegration implants.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This investigation of the safety of titanium transcutaneous osseointegrated nail (TiTON) implants in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suite evaluated whether any adverse events occurred for patients (pain, heating sensation, implant loosening, and delay in care) or for the MRI machine (device damage). Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Academic medical center specializing in musculoskeletal health in Manhattan. Patients/Participants: Patients who had osseointegration surgery underwent retrospective chart review and were also contacted inquiring whether they had subsequent MRI to any body part. Thirty-four patients had 51 total MRI scans: 24 of the osseointegrated limb and 27 of other anatomy. Intervention: 1.5T or 3.0T MRI after TiTON implantation. Main Outcome Measurements: Patients were asked if any adverse experiences such as pain, heating sensation, or implant loosening occurred. All original MRI and reports were sought to evaluate for evidence of adverse patient or machine events. Results: No patients had any recognizable adverse event associated with MRI, including specifically pain, heating sensation, or implant loosening. No evidence of adverse machine interaction could be identified. Conclusions: MRI is safe for patients with press-fit TiTON implants. To optimally ensure safety, osseointegrated patients seeking MRI should confirm with their implant company that no nontitanium components might be part of their total prosthesis construct and confirm they have no after-market modifications that may be ferromagnetic, such as screws or clamps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.