ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
A qualitative analysis of clinician perspectives on community health worker integration at epilepsy centers.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of social context in cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes in epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Innovating the practice of epilepsy care to improve patient outcomes: a model for community health worker integration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Substantial evidence supports community health worker (CHW) interventions lead to improved health outcomes, but health professionals' perceptions of CHW roles and effectiveness may slow integration into care delivery systems. Research on CHWs as members of specialty care teams in clinical settings, especially in the epilepsy field, is limited. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews between April and October 2022 to explore perceptions of multidisciplinary clinicians ( Results: Themes that emerged included: (1) limited epilepsy clinician awareness of the CHW role and minimal experience working with a CHW; (2) limited clinician knowledge of how to recruit CHWs; (3) preference for CHW roles and responsibilities in epilepsy centers being focused on social determinants of health (4) clinician uncertainty around scope of CHW training and supervision; (5) unknown funding mechanisms for CHW integration in epilepsy centers; (6) knowledge of care gaps in addressing social determinants of health needs by epilepsy centers; (7) openness by epilepsy center care team members to CHW integration; and (8) environment and collaborative culture at epilepsy centers. Discussion: Despite limited knowledge and experience regarding CHW roles and mechanisms for recruiting and sustaining CHW positions, the multidisciplinary clinicians interviewed valued the potential benefits of CHWs in an epilepsy center and endorsed a need to better address patients' unmet social determinants of health needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.