ArticleGerms2024
Isolation of Shiga toxin-producing
Article in Germs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Survival, Sublethal Injury, and Recovery in Frozen Food Systems: Implications for Safety, Quality Deterioration, and Cold-Chain Control.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- High prevalence of CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-15 extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producingVeterinary world · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Digestive Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Bacterial Pathogens, Host Susceptibility, and the Impact of Viral Hepatitis.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Shiga toxin-producing Methods: Two hundred and one frozen beef samples were purchased from various supermarkets located in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and subsequently enriched in tryptic soy broth (TSB). From the enriched samples in TSB, 1 mL portion was mixed with immunomagnetic beads (IMB) coated with specific antibodies targeting the Results: Of the 201 examined samples, 88 (43.8%) and 106 (52.7%) were positive for Conclusions: The present study gives a clear perspective on STEC contamination in imported frozen beef marketed in Saudi Arabia. Because of the many possibilities of STEC contamination in imported frozen beef, further studies on the spread of STEC at various levels of imported frozen meat are needed on a long-term basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.