Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271085›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025

Post-operative cosmesis of autologous capsular patch grafts in tube shunt surgery: Case series of 18 eyes.

Lauren Ciulla, Jessie Wang, Mary Qiu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lauren CiullaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jessie WangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mary QiuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Capsule tissue from preexisting tube shunts can be used as autologous patch grafts in patients that require tube revision, exchange, or removal. Purpose: To retrospectively describe the use of autologous capsular patch grafts for tube shunt surgeries and demonstrate their cosmetic outcomes. Methods: Tube shunt surgeries using autologous capsular patch grafts from March 2, 2020 through August 10, 2023 by a single surgeon at the University of Chicago were included in this case series. Results: 18 patients had capsule patch grafts during tube shunt surgeries. 16 patients have post-operative photos available. 18 patients had capsule patch grafts during tube shunt surgeries. 16 patients have post-operative photos available. There were 2 cases of failed superotemporal tube shunts for which a second inferonasal tube was placed. There were 9 cases of same-quadrant Ahmed FP7 to BGI-350 exchange: 7 for uncontrolled IOP, 2 for tube erosion. There were also five cases of same-quadrant exchange with varying tube types for indications such as erosion, hypotony, and elevated intra-ocular pressure. There was also one case of different quadrant exchange for impending endothelial keratoplasty for corneal failure and poor cosmesis of the tube. Finally, there was one case of tube shunt removal for erosion with goniotomy. Duration of post-operative follow-up averaged 57 weeks (range 2-178 weeks). There were no complications related to the autografts. Conclusion: Autologous capsular patch grafts can be efficacious in tube shunt surgeries with good cosmetic outcome. Longer follow up and larger trials are needed.

Indexed as

Autologous capsular patch graftGlaucomaTube shunt

Identifiers

PMID40271085
PMCPMC12017849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.