Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40271044›Full record

ArticleJBJS essential surgical techniques

Soft-Tissue Contouring and Nerve Management During Lower-Limb Osseointegration Surgery.

Anna M Vaeth, Grant G Black, Nicholas A Vernice, Lucy Wei, Clara G Choate, Albert Y Truong, Jason S Hoellwarth, Taylor J Reif, S Robert Rozbruch, David M Otterburn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBJS essential surgical techniques. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna M VaethWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Grant G BlackMedstar Georgetown, Washington, DC.
Nicholas A VerniceNew York University Langone Health New York, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-1680
Lucy WeiWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7089-3717
Clara G ChoateWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4799-5172
Albert Y TruongWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9551-4519
Jason S HoellwarthHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-0656
Taylor J ReifHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-8071
S Robert RozbruchHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-4600
David M OtterburnWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-561X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osseointegration provides a direct prosthesis interface for lower-limb amputees, many of whom are poor candidates for traditional socket-suspended prostheses. These skeletally anchored implants eliminate the skin-prosthesis interface, reducing complications such as soft-tissue breakdown, ulceration, and pain Description: In the present video article, we describe a technique for soft-tissue contouring during single-stage limb osseointegration that involves mobilizing the anterior and posterior musculature to cover the bone-implant interface without excess Alternatives: Alternatives to osseointegration include maximizing the functionality and comfort of a socket prosthesis, either by refitting the prosthesis or by revising the soft tissue of the residual limb. However, both of these strategies have been shown to lead to lower health-related quality of life and are not cost-effective techniques when compared with osseointegration Rationale: Lower-limb osseointegration is particularly beneficial for patients who have the desire to walk and are unable to tolerate traditional socket prostheses because of issues related to poor fit, pain, high metabolic demand, and/or skin breakdown Expected Outcomes: Single-institution studies and systematic reviews have shown that lower-limb osseointegration is safe and effective, often resulting in improved mobility and quality of life Important Tips: Ideally, at least a 4-cm space should be left between the end of the posterior skin flap and the skin aperture in order to minimize the risk of skin necrosis.Insetting the posterior skin flap with quilting sutures allows for enhanced contouring and decreased dead space.RPNI can be utilized in addition to TMR for peripheral nerve management, especially when there is a size mismatch between donor and recipient nerves.Postoperative skin aperture complications can be addressed with topical antibiotics (for infection), silver nitrate (for hypergranulation), and fat grafting and/or steroid injection (for pain).Challenges to adequate peripheral nerve management include failure of the TMR or RPNI to prevent neuroma growth, leading to phantom limb pain and/or residual limb pain. Acronyms and Abbreviations: TMR = targeted muscle reinnervationRPNI = regenerative peripheral nerve interfaceAKA = above-knee amputationBKA = below-knee amputationJP = Jackson-Pratt drainIV = intravenous.

Identifiers

PMID40271044
PMCPMC12011565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.