ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Spinal cord stimulation using time-dynamic pulses achieves longer reversal of allodynia compared to tonic pulses in a rat model of neuropathic pain.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) utilizing time-dynamic pulses (TDPs) is an emergent field of neuromodulation that continuously and automatically modulates pulse parameters. We previously demonstrated that TDPs delivered for 60 min at paresthesia-free or minimal paresthesia amplitudes significantly reversed allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Because the anti-allodynic effect was observed to persist post-stimulation, we hypothesized that the anti-nociceptive effects of TDPs may persist longer than those of tonic stimulation. Methods: We extended SCS stimulation period up to 90 min and investigated the temporal dynamics of SCS-induced analgesia through PWT analysis of the aggregated data from both cohorts. Results: Both TDPs and tonic stimulation reversed paw withdrawal thresholds (PWT) to near pre-neuropathic levels within 30 min. Most TDPs exhibited significantly slower ramp-up slope (analgesia 'wash-in' rates) as compared to tonic stimulation. All TDPs showed slower wind-down slopes (analgesia 'wash-out' rates) compared to tonic, with pulse width modulation reaching significance. Extending SCS from 60 to 90 min revealed that all TDPs maintained analgesic efficacy longer than tonic stimulation, which showed significant decrease at both 75 and 90 min. Discussion: Although TDPs and tonic stimulation comparably mitigated allodynia, TDPs exhibited slower rate of wash-out, suggesting longer-lasting analgesic effects and potentially different mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.