ArticleAPL bioengineering2025
Post-stroke spontaneous motor recovery in mice can be predicted from acute-phase local field potential using machine learning.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing upper limb motor recovery prediction after acute stroke using EEG and subacute data.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- The impact of stroke on intramuscular connective tissue in mice.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke remains a leading cause of long-term disability, underscoring the urgent need for effective predictors of motor recovery. Understanding the electrophysiological changes underlying spontaneous recovery could offer critical insight into recovery mechanisms and aid in predicting individual rehabilitation trajectories. In this study, we investigated the predictive power of local field potentials recorded 2 days post-stroke to forecast 1 month motor recovery in a mouse model of ischemic stroke. By employing a comprehensive machine learning approach, we identified key electrophysiological features that significantly enhanced prediction accuracy. Through nested leave-one-animal-out cross-validation, we achieved high prediction accuracy, correctly identifying motor recovery status in 15 out of 16 mice. Our findings also revealed that pre-stroke brain activity did not contribute to prediction accuracy, suggesting that post-stroke dynamics are the primary determinants of recovery. Notably, we found that features from the contralesional hemisphere were particularly influential in predicting recovery outcomes, underscoring the critical role of the non-lesioned hemisphere in motor recovery. Our data-driven methodology underscores the importance of balancing feature selection to optimize predictive performance, particularly in the context of spontaneous recovery, where insight into natural recovery processes can guide the development of targeted rehabilitation strategies. Ultimately, our findings advocate for a deeper understanding of post-stroke brain dynamics to improve clinical outcomes for stroke patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.