ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2025
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation utilized to support patients with heart failure for balancing treatment and work: A case report.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scoping review of return to work in patients with heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 47-year-old woman with exertional dyspnea was admitted to our hospital. Echocardiography revealed congestive heart failure (HF), with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (13 %) and elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels (877 pg/mL). The patient underwent medical therapy and comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR). At discharge, the oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (AT) was 13.1 mL/kg/min. Outpatient CR consisted of exercise therapy, patient education, and home activity intensity instructions with pulse rate (PR) management using a wearable device. We instructed that activity intensity at home should not exceed the PR at AT. Two months after discharge, the patient's condition was stable, and she was compliant with activity intensity restrictions; therefore, she was allowed to return to work twice a week for 5 h of light work weekly, which was gradually increased. We continued to monitor the PR with wearable devices to ensure compliance with work intensity. Five months after discharge, she achieved a return to work four times a week for 8 h without exacerbation of HF symptoms. The workplace was receptive to the suggestions of the CR team regarding workplace conditions, safe working hours, and frequency, and the patient successfully returned to work, achieving a balance between treatment and work. Learning objective: The use of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation is recommended for the return to work by patients with heart failure. However, specific measures to manage activity intensity for return to work have not been considered fully. The strategy that we adopted involved a combination of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation and the use of wearable devices for guided work intensity management, allowing for a balance between treatment and work responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.