ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2025
Late stent thrombosis six months after ultrathin-strut covered stent implantation in lesion with calcified nodule.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 72-year-old woman undergoing hemodialysis presented with effort angina pectoris due to severe stenosis with calcified nodules in the right coronary artery. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed using an excimer laser coronary angioplasty and an ultrathin-strut covered stent (CS) was implanted due to coronary perforation. An additional durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES) was implanted because of protrusions in the proximal edge of the CS. However, late stent thrombosis occurred six months after ultrathin-strut covered stent implantation for a calcified nodule. After thrombus aspiration, intravascular imaging analyses revealed that the struts within the CS were fully covered with thick neointimal hyperplasia. In contrast, half of the struts in the DP-EES were uncovered and some struts were malapposed. In this case, we speculated that the cause of the current late stent thrombosis was dispersion of the thrombi formed at the uncovered with malapposed sites in the DP-EES into a severe stenosis caused by neointimal hyperplasia in the CS. Neointimal hyperplasia occurs at the edge of the CS, a CS should be implanted locating its edge on the site with less plaque. Learning objectives: •To evaluate the mechanism of late stent thrombosis after ultrathin strut-covered stent implantation for lesions with calcified nodules.•To discuss the optimal covered stent placement locating its edge on the site with less plaque.•To recognize that introduction of an ultrathin-strut covered stent for lesions with calcified nodules requires careful consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.