ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2025
Advanced retrieval technique using pacemaker lead extraction methods for a long-term implanted inferior vena cava filter with caval penetration of the pancreas.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are sometimes implanted in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE). Long-term filter placement is associated with various complications and retrieval failure using conventional methods. We describe a novel method for retrieval of long-term implanted IVC filters. A 41-year-old woman was diagnosed with left common iliac DVT. A temporary IVC filter was implanted to prevent life-threatening PE in parallel with anticoagulation therapy, followed by the long-term retrievable IVC filter (Denali, Bard Medical, Georgia, IN, USA). After successful anticoagulation therapy, the retrieval of the Denali by conventional methods failed due to adhesion to the vessel wall. We decided to remove the Denali using pacemaker lead extraction methods. Twenty months after the Denali implantation, extraction was performed under general anesthesia. A snare catheter (Lassos, Osypka, Berlin, Germany) was used to capture the proximal hook. The severe adhesions around the anchors were carefully dissected using a mechanical sheath (Byrd Dilator Sheaths, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). The Denali was extracted using the counter-traction technique. The post-operative course was uneventful. This technique may be useful for uneventful removal of long-term implanted IVC filters, potentially avoiding open surgery. Additional experience is needed to overcome the limitation of a single case report. Learning objective: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are sometimes used to reduce the risk of life-threatening pulmonary embolism. Long-term implanted IVC filters are associated with filter-related complications and can be difficult to remove by conventional methods due to adhesion around the filter. We describe a novel IVC filter retrieval technique using pacemaker lead extraction tools that has the potential to avoid highly invasive open surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.