ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Private sector quality interventions to improve maternal and newborn health in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The private health sector provides significant maternal and newborn health (MNH) services in mixed healthcare systems in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), making it an essential partner in achieving universal health coverage (UHC). Although some studies have mapped the private sector's activities in MNH care in LMICs, limited knowledge exists about specific quality of care interventions. This scoping review addresses this gap by mapping quality of care interventions implemented by private healthcare providers for MNH care in LMICs. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), nine electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they examined an intervention primarily designed to deliver MNH care by the private sector in LMICs. Results: A total of 11,922 titles and abstracts were screened, with 38 meeting the inclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative data were extracted for descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, focusing on maternal mortality, maternal morbidity, newborn mortality, newborn morbidity, quality of care, experience of care, private sector care usage, and stillbirth. Findings are presented as a systematic narrative synthesis using the WHO's National Quality Policy and Strategy (NQPS) framework's quality intervention groups. While various interventions exist, public-private partnership (PPP) schemes and vertical programmes have received more scholarly attention. Most studies emphasised health outcome indicators. Discussion: We argue that outcome reporting should be diversified to include stakeholders' perspectives, helping researchers and policymakers understand how governments can engage the private sector in sustainable partnerships that strengthen health systems and advance UHC with quality. Interventions should be people-centred, incorporating feedback mechanisms that promote accountability and empower intended beneficiaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.