ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Digital inclusion finance, government subsidies and R&D investment-empirical evidence based on listed Chinese pharmaceutical firms.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital inclusive finance, with 'universality' as its core feature, can stimulate enterprises to increase capital investment in research and development (R&D) through diversified channels. Using the digital financial inclusion index of 337 prefecture-level cities in China and the empirical data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share-listed pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises from 2011 to 2022, the article empirically examines the impact mechanism of digital financial inclusion on R&D investment of pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises from the perspective of government subsidy by using a high-dimensional fixed-effects model, a two-stage systematic GMM, and a moderated-effects test method. It is found that digital financial inclusion has a positive incentive effect on pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises to increase R&D investment, and this positive effect still holds after the endogeneity test and robustness test. The results of the moderating effect test indicate that government subsidies play a positive moderating role in the process of digital financial inclusion affecting enterprises' R&D investment. Further analyses show that digital financial inclusion has a more significant role in promoting the intensity of R&D investment in pharmaceutical enterprises in private enterprises, small and medium-sized enterprises, and regions with lower levels of traditional financial development. Finally, policy suggestions are put forward according to the conclusion. Including the government to promote digital infrastructure and policy support, financial institutions to build data platforms to support pharmaceutical innovation, and enterprises to increase investment in research and development and expand financing channels to jointly promote the transformation and upgrading of the industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.