Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270736›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025

The effects of traditional Chinese exercises on anxiety and depression in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Huan Feng, YanJing Li, QingChuan Wang, Ye Tao, ZhiHua Wang

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huan FengCollege of Physical Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
YanJing LiCollege of Physical Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
QingChuan WangCollege of Sports, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China.
Ye TaoCollege of Sports, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China.
ZhiHua WangCollege of Physical Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate the comparative effectiveness of traditional Chinese exercises (TCEs) and other interventions for managing anxiety and depression in adults using a network meta-analysis approach. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: Literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving TCEs for adults with anxiety or depression were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the ROB2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare the effectiveness of interventions. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was used to rank the interventions. Data sources: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: RCTs involving adults aged 18 years and older, intervention groups engaging in TCEs, comparator groups with no intervention, routine treatment, or distinct interventions, reported outcomes related to anxiety or depression assessed using validated tools, and studies published in English or Chinese. Results: A total of 82 RCTs were included, with 4,501 participants. For anxiety, Liu Zi Jue (SUCRA = 99.5%), Tai Chi (SUCRA = 87.6%), and CBT (SUCRA = 75.3%) were the most effective interventions. For depression, Tai Chi (SUCRA = 95.5%), Yijinjing (SUCRA = 89.2%), and CBT (SUCRA = 83.6%) ranked as the most effective. TCEs demonstrated comparable or superior efficacy to well-established interventions like CBT. The study also found that TCEs have high adherence rates, low costs, and the potential for large-scale promotion and value. Conclusion: This systematic review and network meta-analysis provides evidence for the efficacy of TCEs, particularly Tai Chi, Liu Zi Jue, and Yijinjing, in managing anxiety and depression in adults. Despite limitations such as heterogeneity in intervention protocols and study populations, the findings suggest that these exercises offer therapeutic benefits and may serve as accessible, cost-effective, and culturally-relevant treatment options. Further research is needed to establish optimal dosages, assess long-term effects, and evaluate generalizability across diverse contexts. Systematic review registration: CRD42025637146.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionExercise TherapyMedicine, Chinese TraditionalAdultHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTai Jianxietydepressionmeta-analysisTai ChiTCEstraditional Chinese exercises

Identifiers

PMID40270736
PMCPMC12016670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.