ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Clinical and epidemiological profile of congenital hyperinsulinism in Brazil.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital hyperinsulinism is the most common cause of persistent hypoglycemia in children, often leading to severe neurological complications. Objective: This study aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological profile of CHI in Brazil. Methods: A cross- sectional study was conducted with caregivers of CHI patients affiliated with the Associação do Hiperinsulinismo Congênito do Brasil. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire adapted from the HI Global Registry, covering clinical presentation, diagnostic pathways, genetic findings, and treatment strategies. Results: Caregivers of 68 patients participated. Symptoms appeared before six months of age in 60% of cases, but 35.5% initially received incorrect diagnoses. Genetic testing was performed in 43 patients, but pathogenic variants were identified in only 7 cases, while the majority (31) was not aware of their results. Diazoxide was the most used medication, though 13% required pancreatectomy. Developmental delays were reported in 44% of cases. Conclusions: Delayed diagnosis and limited access to genetic testing and specialized treatments remain significant barriers in Brazil. This study underscores the need for improved awareness, early recognition strategies, and expanded access to genetic and therapeutic resources to optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.