Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Construction and validation of a deep learning-based diagnostic model for segmentation and classification of diabetic foot.

Guang-Xin Zhou, Yu-Kun Tao, Jin-Zheng Hou, Hui-Juan Zhu, Li Xiao, Na Zhao, Xiao-Wen Wang, Bao-Lin Du, Da Zhang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guang-Xin ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yu-Kun TaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jin-Zheng HouDepartment of Endocrinology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hui-Juan ZhuDepartment of Endocrinology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li XiaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.
Na ZhaoChongqing Zhijian Life Technology Co., Ltd, Chongqing, China.
Xiao-Wen WangChongqing Zhijian Life Technology Co., Ltd, Chongqing, China.
Bao-Lin DuChongqing Zhijian Life Technology Co., Ltd, Chongqing, China.
Da ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) images using deep learning models, achieving automated segmentation and classification of the wounds, with the goal of exploring the application of artificial intelligence in the field of diabetic foot care. Methods: A total of 671 images of DFU were selected for manual annotation of the periwound erythema, ulcer boundaries, and various components within the wounds (granulation tissue, necrotic tissue, tendons, bone tissue, and gangrene). Three instance segmentation models (Mask2former, Deeplabv3plus, and Swin-Transformer) were constructed to identify DFU, and the segmentation and classification results of the three models were compared. Results: Among the three models, Mask2former exhibited the best recognition performance, with a mean Intersection over Union of 65%, surpassing Deeplabv3's 62% and Swin-Transformer's 52%. The Intersection over Union value of Mask2former for wound recognition reached 85.9%, with IoU values of 80%, 78%, 62%, 61%, 47%, and 39% for granulation tissue, gangrene, bone tissue, necrotic tissue, tendons, and periwound erythema, respectively. In the wound classification task, the Mask2former model achieved an accuracy of 0.9185 and an Area Under the Curve of 0.9429 for the classification of Wagner grade 1-2, grade 3, and grade 4 wounds. Conclusion: Among the three deep learning models, the Mask2former model demonstrated the best overall performance. This method can effectively assist clinicians in recognizing DFU and segmenting the tissues within the wounds.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetic FootImage Processing, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleartificial intelligenceclassificationdeep learningdiabetic foot ulcerssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40270716
PMCPMC12014428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.