ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Construction and validation of a deep learning-based diagnostic model for segmentation and classification of diabetic foot.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection for colorectal polyps of any size, ≤ 5 mm, and 6-9 mm: a meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Health Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence, Access Inequities, and Public Health Integration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- [Evolution of DFU treatment strategies: from simple coverage with traditional dressings to active modulation with smart materials].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Review
- AI-Based Models for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment: Scoping Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical applications of machine learning for infection assessment in diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) images using deep learning models, achieving automated segmentation and classification of the wounds, with the goal of exploring the application of artificial intelligence in the field of diabetic foot care. Methods: A total of 671 images of DFU were selected for manual annotation of the periwound erythema, ulcer boundaries, and various components within the wounds (granulation tissue, necrotic tissue, tendons, bone tissue, and gangrene). Three instance segmentation models (Mask2former, Deeplabv3plus, and Swin-Transformer) were constructed to identify DFU, and the segmentation and classification results of the three models were compared. Results: Among the three models, Mask2former exhibited the best recognition performance, with a mean Intersection over Union of 65%, surpassing Deeplabv3's 62% and Swin-Transformer's 52%. The Intersection over Union value of Mask2former for wound recognition reached 85.9%, with IoU values of 80%, 78%, 62%, 61%, 47%, and 39% for granulation tissue, gangrene, bone tissue, necrotic tissue, tendons, and periwound erythema, respectively. In the wound classification task, the Mask2former model achieved an accuracy of 0.9185 and an Area Under the Curve of 0.9429 for the classification of Wagner grade 1-2, grade 3, and grade 4 wounds. Conclusion: Among the three deep learning models, the Mask2former model demonstrated the best overall performance. This method can effectively assist clinicians in recognizing DFU and segmenting the tissues within the wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.