Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270630›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025

Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and manual therapy on active trigger points of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in cervicogenic headache: A randomized controlled trial.

Chunfeng Xia, Yanjun Zhao, Lizhen Lin, Yanni Yu, Jialiang Wang, Jiecheng Fan, Xiangzhen Yuan, Shuyun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chunfeng XiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3233-6894
Yanjun ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3844-2927
Lizhen LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8468-0596
Yanni YuDepartment of Ultrasound, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8326-0040
Jialiang WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5459-0280
Jiecheng FanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8873-7991
Xiangzhen YuanDepartment of Neurology, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-9048
Shuyun ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0001-0969-8180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and manual therapy (MT) on active trigger points of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) in patients with cervicogenic headache (CEH). Patients and methods: A total of 42 patients were included (27 females, 15 males; mean age: 33.2±7.7 years; range, 18 to 45 years) in the randomized controlled trial between March 2022 and December 2022. The patients were randomly divided into the ESWT group (n=21) and the MT group (n=21). Each group received therapy once a week for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and secondary outcome measures were pressure pain threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and stiffness (shear elastic modulus) of the SCM measured at baseline, postintervention, and four weeks after treatment. Results: One patient from the ESWT group was lost to follow-up. The missing data were imputed for intention-to-treat analysis. Significant decreases of VAS, NDI, and shear elastic modulus of SCM were found at postintervention and four weeks after treatment in both groups (p<0.01). The PPT scores markedly increased over time compared to baseline in both groups (p<0.01). The repeated measures of analysis of variance revealed a significant time effect (p<0.001) in each outcome variable for both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in VAS, PPT, NDI, and the stiffness of SCM at each time point. Conclusion: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and MT were equally effective in pain relief, functional recovery, and reduction of muscle stiffness. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy may be used as an alternative treatment method for CEH patients with active myofascial trigger points of the SCM.

Indexed as

Cervicogenic headacheextracorporeal shock wave therapymanual therapytrigger points.

Identifiers

PMID40270630
PMCPMC12012926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.