ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
Feasibility study of core training in knee injury recovery.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of core and routine training on joint function, anterior tibia translation and balance in patients with knee joint injury. Patients and methods: Between March 2021 and March 2022, a total of 70 patients (49 males, 21 females; mean age: 31.2±5.3 years; range, 17 to 44 years) with knee ligament injury or meniscus injury were included. The patients were divided into core training group (n=35) and conventional training group (n=35) by matching method. During the recovery process, the regular training group performed routine training, whereas the core training group engaged in core training. Both groups were trained for a total of eight weeks. After training, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), knee Lysholm score, KT-2000 tibial anterior translation, and the star excursion balance test (SEBT) results were collected. Results: The mean VAS scores in both groups were decreased from baseline values. The mean Lysholm score increased from baseline data; the degree of tibial anterior translation decreased compared with baseline data (p<0.05). The mean SEBT scores showed significant improvement over baseline data. In contrast with the routine training group, the mean VAS score of core training was lower and the total score of Lysholm was higher (p<0.05). When bending the knee at 90°, the mean tibial anterior translation was 3.87±1.23 mm in the core training group, significantly lower than in the regular training group (p<0.05). The SEBT results showed that, after eight weeks of training, healthy and injured legs in core training group exceeded those of the regular training group in the farthest distance (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our study results indicate that core training is more successful than regular training in reducing pain, and it can ameliorate the dynamic balance stability of patients with knee injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.