ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Identification of metabolomics-based biomarker discovery in individuals with down syndrome utilizing kernel-tree model-enhanced explainable artificial intelligence methodology.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Metabolomics and metabolites in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Driven Metabolomic Biomarker Discovery in Glioblastoma: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Key regulators of lactation performance in Xinjiang Brown cattle and Chinese Holstein cattle unraveled by multi-omics integration.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Targeted serum metabolomic profiling and machine learning approach in Alzheimer's disease using the Alzheimer's disease diagnostics clinical study (ADDIA) cohort.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) model integrated with machine learning (ML) to comprehensively investigate metabolic differences between individuals with Down syndrome (T21) and healthy controls (D21) and to identify novel/pathway-specific biomarkers. In this study, ML classifiers including AdaBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, KTBoost, and XGBoost are applied to metabolomics data obtained from metabolomic analyses by high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) using blood plasma samples of 316 T21 and 103 D21 individuals, and the importance of metabolites is evaluated by XAI-based SHAP analysis. The KTBoost model shows the highest classification performance with an accuracy of 90.4% and area under the curve (AUC) of 95.9%, outperforming AdaBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, and XGBoost. Significant downregulation and upregulation of some metabolites were observed in the T21 group compared to the D21 group. Metabolites such as vitamin C, taurolithocholic acid, sphingosine, and prostaglandin A2/B2/J2 are observed at low levels in the T21 group. In contrast, metabolites such as thymidine, tau-roursodeoxycholic acid, serine, and nervonic acid are elevated. SHAP analysis revealed that L-Citrulline, Kynurenin, Prostaglandin A2/B2/J2, Urate, and Pantothenate metabolites could be novel/pathway-specific biomarkers to differentiate the T21 group. This study revealed significant metabolic alterations in individuals with T21 and demonstrated the effectiveness of the combination of ML and XAI methods to identify novel/pathway-specific biomarkers. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of Down syndrome's molecular mechanisms and the development of future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.