ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025
Dimensional effects of surface morphology and trapped air on mammalian cell adhesion to special wetting surfaces.
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials with special wettability have broad biomedical applications, including the control of mammalian cell adhesion and inhibiting biofilm formation. However, limited understanding of mammalian cellular responses to superhydrophobic materials with trapped air restricts their clinical applications. In this study, we fabricated materials with varied nanostructures and wettability, and systematically compared short-term mammalian cellular responses in the presence and absence of trapped air. Our results show that small nanostructures generate small, often invisible air bubbles at the solid-liquid interface when in contact with mammalian cell suspensions. In the presence of these small bubbles, the number of adhered cells was comparable to both the same sample without trapped air and its hydrophilic counterpart, contradicting the intuitive expectations that trapped air would reduce cell adhesion. In contrast, larger nanostructures resulted in visible, hundred-micron-sized air bubbles, which significantly inhibited cell adhesion. This effect was evident when comparing the same superhydrophobic sample with and without trapped air, as well as against hydrophilic counterparts with the same morphology. Further tracking of large air bubbles on the hydrophobic materials revealed that no cells adhered to the areas occupied by hundred-micron-sized air bubbles, while more cells accumulated at the solid-liquid-gas triple line. Hence, this work deepens the understanding of cellular responses to superhydrophobic materials, revealing that material structure size influences the size of trapped air and subsequently dominates cell adhesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.