ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The perspective and experiences of significant others on electroconvulsive therapy.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an essential but often controversial treatment in psychiatry. While existing research focuses on patient outcomes, the perspectives of significant others (SOs) remain underexplored. They play, nevertheless, a crucial role in decision-making, treatment adherence, and post-treatment evaluation. To better understand their perceptions, challenges, and support needs, this study aims to explore the lived experiences of SOs and ECT. Methods: A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed using semi-structured interviews with nine SOs of patients who underwent ECT. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's framework, and data were analyzed using the NVivo software. Results: Before ECT, SOs experienced a significant emotional burden, describing their lives as unlivable due to the patients' severe illness. The decision to start ECT was marked by feelings of responsibility and fear but also driven by hope. During ECT, SOs closely monitored treatment effects and side effects, balancing improvements against challenges such as memory loss and fatigue. The psychiatrist played a central role in shaping perceptions and instilling hope. During the maintenance phase, SOs faced logistical challenges and stigma but aimed to integrate ECT into daily life while supporting patient autonomy. Conclusion: This study highlights the complex role of SOs in ECT. Unlike previous studies that have focused on caregiver burden, it emphasizes the role of hope in decision-making and treatment adherence. SOs value transparent communication from psychiatrists and seek structured support systems to navigate practical and emotional challenges. Stigma remains a significant barrier to open discussion and social integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.