ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Differences in muscle activity and intermuscular coordination between dominant and non-dominant hands during chopstick manipulation.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To develop an efficient rehabilitation program for patients with stroke to acquire fine motor skills such as chopstick manipulation, it is necessary to examine the differences in fundamental muscle functions between the hands during motor tasks. The aim of this study was to clarify the differences in muscle activity and intermuscular coordination between dominant and non-dominant hands during chopstick manipulation. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy adults performed the task of picking up different-sized objects using chopsticks with either their dominant or non-dominant hand. Surface electromyography of 11 intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles was performed, and muscle activity and muscle activity waveforms during the task were calculated. Activity patterns and weighting for each pattern were extracted from the muscle activity waveforms using non-negative matrix factorization to represent muscle synergy. The muscle activity and weighting were compared between the dominant and non-dominant hands and among different-sized objects. Results: The activities of most intrinsic and extrinsic muscles did not significantly differ between the dominant and non-dominant hands or among different-sized objects. Although activity patterns showed the coordination of intrinsic hand muscles in both the dominant and non-dominant hands, the combinations of the weighting differed between the dominant and non-dominant hands. The non-dominant hand had different muscle activation patterns of intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles compared to the dominant hand. The activity patterns and weighting were mostly similar across different-sized objects. Conclusion: The dominant hand showed coordination of the first and second lumbrical muscles, whereas the non-dominant hand showed no muscle activation patterns between the muscles. Therefore, it is important to emphasize the first and second lumbrical in the non-dominant hand during rehabilitation to improve the coordination between the muscles of the two hands during chopstick manipulation to effectively improve chopstick manipulation skills in the non-dominant hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.