Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40270510›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Impact of changes in regulatory framework on approval of medicines for rare diseases and applicability to market access policies.

Fran Brown, Maximilian Vargas, Sanja Stanisic, Geoff Fatzinger, Oxana Iliach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fran BrownCertara, Radnor, PA, United States.
Maximilian VargasCertara, Radnor, PA, United States.
Sanja StanisicCertara, Radnor, PA, United States.
Geoff FatzingerCertara, Radnor, PA, United States.
Oxana IliachCertara, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of the Orphan Drug Act in the USA in 1983, followed by adoption of the Orphan Drug Regulation No 141/2000 in the EU in 2000, led to a change in landscape of drug development for rare diseases. The introduction of regulations, guidance documents and incentives aimed at increasing the availability of new medicines for rare diseases resulted in an increase in approvals of 3 and 11-fold for branded products and generic medicines, respectively, in the decade 2013-2023 compared to 1990-2000. This effort was successful due to the collaboration of Regulatory Authorities, industry, patient groups and other stakeholders keen to leverage an integrated evidence approach using non-traditional approaches. While the regulatory approval landscape moved toward integration, the effective access to those medicines over the same period was globally fragmented with pricing and access determined at a local level. There is growing recognition of the importance of addressing the needs of rare disease patients and a concerted effort to balance innovation with affordability and access.

Indexed as

approvalmarket accessmarketingorphan drugrare diseaseregulatory policy

Identifiers

PMID40270510
PMCPMC12016575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.