ArticleBiotechnology progress
Techno-economic analysis of membrane-based continuous capture chromatography platforms for large-scale antibody production.
Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Enzyme Production: Critical Bottlenecks and Integrated Engineering Solutions.Journal of basic microbiology · 2026Review
- Techno-economic analysis of membrane-based continuous capture chromatography platforms for large-scale antibody production.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous manufacturing platforms and membrane chromatography are process technologies with the potential to reduce production costs and minimize process variability in monoclonal antibody production. This study presents a simulation and optimization framework to perform techno-economic analyses of these strategies. Multi-objective optimization was used to compare batch and continuous multicolumn operating modes and membrane and resin process alternatives, revealing performance differences in productivity and cost of goods attributed to variations in dynamic binding capacity, media geometry, and process residence time. From the set of optimal process configurations, we selected one membrane and one resin platform alternative yielding the highest net present values to undergo sensitivity analyses involving variations in batch cadence and product selling price. For the scenarios considered in this work, membrane continuous platforms showed benefits in the cost of goods and process mass intensity. Their shorter residence time compared to resins positions them as a viable alternative for single-use capture chromatography. Moreover, this low residence time makes membrane platforms more flexible to changes in throughput, an essential feature for integrating capture into fully continuous processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.