ArticlePest management science2025
What you eat is what we need: using ants to detect spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) DNA.
Article in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of invasive species such as the spotted lanternfly (SLF, Lycorma delicatula) is critical for effective management including eradication efforts and limiting further spread. SLF excretes honeydew containing detectable DNA, providing a unique opportunity to leverage environmental DNA (eDNA) for its detection. This study introduces the ant-derived DNA (antDNA) approach, utilizing ants as 'honeydew samplers' to detect SLF DNA. We validated the effectiveness of this method through three experiments.
resultsUsing SLF-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we consistently detected SLF DNA in ants foraging or nesting near SLF infestations. We then showed that after a single honeydew meal, SLF DNA persisted in ants for at least 5 days, even when, subsequently, ants were fed plain honey solution. Lastly, ants collected from honey-baited lure stations along transects radiating from SLF infestations yielded positive detections up to 100 m from the core infestations, demonstrating the method's extensive detection range. These findings confirm that ants, through their active foraging and feeding on environmental honeydew and ability to retain the ingested material, are highly reliable SLF DNA samplers.
conclusionCombined with ants' ecological dominance and the ease and low cost of ant collection, the antDNA method offers a sensitive, efficient and practical alternative to traditional, labor-intensive approaches for detecting SLF and potentially other honeydew-producing insects. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.