ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025
Preferences of Non-Metropolitan Youth Towards Accessing Mental Health Services: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the preferences of non-metropolitan youth towards mental health service access.
settingTasmania, Australia.
participantsYouth aged 13 to 25 years (n = 214).
methodsChoice-based conjoint analysis (CBC) which is a quantitative study design, was employed. In this CBC study, an online survey presented twelve choice sets reflecting seven different mental health service attributes (mental health concern, service provider, cost, wait time, service delivery method, travel time and transport mode), with youth asked to choose their preferred option for access. Choice-based conjoint analysis determined preferred mental health service attributes and the relative weighting of different levels within each attribute.
resultsOf the seven attributes, service provider, cost, wait time and service delivery method were of the highest importance to youth when considering mental health service access. Within the listed health service attributes, youth ranked: psychologists; no cost; no wait time; face-to-face delivery; travel time of 15 min; and travel by private car highest. Various socio-demographic variables were associated with attribute and level choices.
conclusionTasmanian youth prefer to access mental health services when provided in person, by a psychologist, for free and with no waiting time. Further research is required to investigate whether mental healthcare preferences for non-metropolitan youth change depending on geographical location, mental health status, level of mental health literacy, a greater choice of service providers and service delivery methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.