ArticleArtificial organs2025
In Vitro Comparison of Device-Induced Hemolysis, Platelet Defects, and von Willebrand Factor Degradation Between the HeartMate 2 and HeartMate 3 Pumps.
Article in Artificial organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Device-Induced Blood Damage in Pump-Assisted Circulation: A Comparative Study of HeartMate III and BrioVAD Pumps.Artificial organs · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been utilized to maintain the circulatory demands of patients with end-stage heart failure. Despite their positive impact, hemocompatibility-related adverse events remain a major challenge. The aim of this study is to compare in vitro hemocompatibility performance between the HeartMate 2 (HM2) and HeartMate 3 (HM3) pumps by assessing device-induced blood damage in an in vitro circulatory loop.
methodsFresh healthy human blood was circulated for 4 h in a circulatory loop assisted by an HM2 or HM3 pump at a flow rate of 4.5 L/min and a pressure head of 75 mmHg. Hourly blood samples were collected for analysis of hemolysis, platelet activation, platelet receptor shedding, and high molecular weight multimer (HMWM) degradation of von Willebrand factor (VWF).
resultsThe data from the hourly blood samples showed that the HM3 pump caused significantly lower levels of hemolysis, platelet activation, platelet receptor shedding, and HMWM degradation of VWF compared to the HM2 pump.
conclusionThe HM3 exhibited superior overall hemocompatibility to the HM2, underscoring the advantages of the fully magnetically levitated centrifugal pump design in the HM3 compared to the mechanical bearing-supported axial pump design of the HM2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.